25-26 WCC Game #14: Seattle U

Tip-off: Wednesday, 7pm in the Leavey Center
TV: ESPN+
Line: Torvik: Broncos -13.9, 90% win probability; ESPN: SCU -13.5, 88% win probability
Over/Under: 146.5
Torvik: Broncos #35, Redhawks #120
(Broncos #24, Redhawks #125 over Last 10 Games)

Seattle
Holy Trap Game, Batman! Santa Clara has executed an almost unprecedented 8-game winning streak, building from “technically still in contention” to “in the field.” But first, the Broncos need to beat a Jesuit school from the state of Washington…the other one. Don’t even think of Spokane. The most important Santa Clara game in 20 years is Wednesday night against the Seattle University Redhawks (née Chieftans).

Quick trivia: Rank the top four WCC defenses (in conference):

1. Seattle
2. Gonzaga
3. Saint Mary’s
4. Santa Clara

How did you do? Were you successful in identifying the Seattle Redhawks as having the WCC’s top defense? And it’s not just over-performance in the WCC either. Seattle has a top-25 defense in all of CBB. Seattle’s defense is as close to Houston as SMC’s is to Seattle on a possession-adjusted basis.

Then why have you heard so little about Seattle in the WCC? Well, it’s because they have an offense that’s down in the 300s–the worst in the WCC during conference play. Seattle doesn’t give up points, but they have a helluva time scoring.

Santa Clara has already faced a team built similarly: North Texas. But that one went down to the wire. Can SCU dictate pace and prevent Seattle from mucking the game up and keeping themselves in a close one? It will take a lot of mental focus, and a good offensive game plan. This is the most important SCU game in 20+ years. Don’t you dare think about the next one.

Likely Starters and Key Bench

Height + Position Player Name Torvik Adj. Efficiency PPG Other Stats
6-3 Point Guard Maleek Arington 0.1 4.6 4.4 asts; 2.2 stls
6-0 Guard Brayden Maldonado 2.5 14.6 2.6 asts; 1.5 stls; 35.9% from 3P; 92% FTs
6-7 Wing Will Heimbrodt -0.1 11.6 5.2 rebs; 2.6 blks
6-8 Forward Junseok Yeo 0.8 12.0 3.8 rebs; 29.2% from 3P
7-0 Center Austin Maurer 1.4 7.7 5.0 rebs
6-3 Guard John Christofilis 0.2 5.6
6-10 Center Houran Dan 0.3 5.6 2.7 rebs

Seattle’s excellent defense starts with two of SCU’s strengths: forcing TOs and blocking shots. Indeed, the Redhawks do both as well or better than SCU. Heimbrodt, in particular, is a defensive machine, blocking shots and stealing the ball multiple times a game. They play tough, almost suffocating defense. Like the Broncos, they send the other team to the line a fair amount as a result.

On the offensive end, Seattle is largely a three-man show: Maldonado, Heimbrodt, and Yeo have taken a majority of the Redhawks’ shots this season. For a few weeks at the start of the season, it looked like Maldonado was going to push Ike for WCC POY. But in conference, Maldonado has become a shell of his former self, with his efficiency falling off a cliff. In fact, none of Seattle’s players make the top-50 in overall efficiency in WCC play per Torvik. Seattle’s offense has truly gone dark, and they use their defense to grind it out and hold on as best as they can.

For SCU, the key really is just focus. Remember that this Seattle team took the Zags to overtime in Spokane. Seattle will be hunting for steals and poorly-timed shots that are easy to block. Santa Clara needs to work hard for the best shot with crisp passing and cutting. On the defensive end, SCU just needs to contain Maldonado. Yes, his production has taken a dive. But he has plenty of talent to go on a heater.

Seattle’s recipe for the upset is turnovers plus a hot Brayden Maldonado. The Broncos need to take away both. It’s not a game for style points–Seattle does not let teams run away with the game easily. Rather, play fundamentally-sound ball and build the lead over 40 minutes for a safe win.

Prediction: 82-70 Santa Clara. Knapper has a very solid game with 16 points and 5 assists.

3 Likes

These Redhawks were 11-2 at one point!

The Broncos need to lock in and show up - and I hope you will too, if possible!

If you do, look for the fellow in the 1980s SC Football letterman jacket.

7 Likes

#FeedtheGraveDigger should be the gameplan

2 Likes

We are now the hunted and not the hunter. Have to bring great energy every night. If we do, we’ll be OK, but Seattle is a tough group.

2 Likes

I’ve been wrestling with this. I can’t be at Gonzaga or the Hilltop (:sob: to both), but I already have my SMC tickets. It’s probably too tough to fight through 80 miles of rush hour to get to a 7 PM game in the South Bay, but I could get inspiration tomorrow.

But I think this may be the year I finally go to Vegas…

I’m inverted - SMC is the hard one to get to.

I can walk to the Hilltop, and can CalTrain to SCU for home games, though late tips equal a pretty late night.

If we dance, I’m going wherever it might be…

I’ll be there in Moraga and Gonzaga.

Need to explore the Hilltop and saving my brownie points “just in case” for a NCAA tournament appearance.

1 Like

Great preview, thanks!

Since I’m new to this board, I’m wondering if it has been discussed how Bukky gets called for a comically unnecessary reach-in foul beyond the perimeter every. single. game. We might as well have a contest to guess which part of the game it happens, because it’s as certain as death & taxes. I’m gonna go with 3:20 left in the first half for the Seattle U game.

3 Likes

You don’t like when our 7’1 center commits a reach in foul on the other teams point guard standing in the center logo with 23 seconds left on the shot clock?

Other than that, I really like Bukky’s game!

8 Likes

One of the announcers said that Bukky was 6’4 as a high school freshman and used to be a guard . Is that true ?

1 Like

Yes, that is correct.

1 Like

I wonder if he committed stupid fouls 32 feet from the basket when he was 6’4”?

3 Likes

In his defense, he does get some steals and resultant dunks from out there. But more important to stay in the game and protect the rim.

1 Like

I actually quite like him and he occasionally does poke it away… We’d be better served with two Bukkys, not zero.

I teach my dog some new swear words when he fires off a three, but they actually go in at a decent clip.

1 Like

So do I! Don’t get me wrong, he is a very important piece of the puzzle. He’s just making some mistakes, committing bad fouls early in games. For example, there was a game where he committed two fouls in the first three minutes of the game!

Agreed. Other than unnecessary foul trouble keeping him off the floor, he’s doing great. I love his alley-oop dunks, although opponents seem to be getting wise to it recently.

This game is a bit like Pacific game….a sound defensive time with just enough offensive prowess to hurt if they have a hot shooting night.

Patty has articulated their D, it is legit, tops in the WCC in league play. Good size at center, a shortish but pogo stick leaper at the 4 who blocks a ton of shots. A strong defensive guard in Arington who will likely be matched up on Hammond.

Aside from their very poor shooting offense, another area of weakness is rebounding where they are last in the league play at offensive rebounding, and 9th in defensive rebounding. I suspect some of the poor offensive rebounding is a by product of emphasizing transition defense.

The concern for me is that Seattle just uglies it up, forces a low possession grinder game. The Broncos have to fight that, generate turnovers and do well on the offensive glass and push for fast break opportunities off both.

Focus on the here and now….just go 1-0.

1 Like

The line is SCU -13.5 with an over/under of 146.5.

Vegas is pretty confident in the Broncos being able to overpower Seattle’s defense.

Anyone want to guess (no cheating!) the last time the Broncos were -13.5 or better and then s**t the proverbial bed?

I am hopeful for a victory (and will be there), but just sayin’ there’s always a chance.

Loyola University Chicago?