WCC Game 11: UOP

Tip-off: Thursday, 4 pm at the Leavey Center
TV: ESPN+
Line: Torvik: SCU -23.1, 96% win probability; ESPN: 96% win probability, SCU -16.5.

The Tigers
The Tigers have been moribund largely since Coach Bob Thomason left the program before their re-entrance to the WCC. Yes, there were a couple of decent years (emphasis on decent and not good) under now-GA Tech Coach Damon “Mighty Mouse” Stoudamire. Those years were characterized by tough, aggressive teams that played solid defense. Then Leonard Perry took over for three seasons ending with an 0-16 conference record last year. (Hey, we know what that’s like!) Canadian Xs and Os wunderkind, Dave Smart, was brought in to right the ship and, well, it hasn’t happened overnight. UOP is 7-17 (5-17 versus D1) and 2-8 in conference. Fully 40% of their D1 wins are over poor Wazzu who didn’t realize their main conference rivals would be in Stockton and not Spokane.

This isn’t a good team. But two wins against WSU and a close-ish game against SMC should be enough to warn against phoning in a game here.

Starters:

  • 6-7 forward Elias Ralph (16.2pts, 7.5rebs, 1.2blks, 29.9% from 3)
  • 7-0 center Jazz Gardner (4.8pts, 4.0rebs, 63.5% from the field)
  • 6-6 wing Elijah Fisher (16.3pts, 5.1rebs, 30.2% from 3)
  • 6-4 guard Lamar Washington (12.6pts, 5.0rebs, 6.1asts, 30.9% from 3)
  • 6-3 guard Jefferson Koulibaly (7.0pts, 2.1rebs, 35.3% from 3)

Key Bench:

  • 6-4 guard Peter Krivokapic (6.6pts, 24.6% from 3)
  • 6-4 guard Carter Benton (2.5pts, 33% from 3)

No hiding the ball here. Pacific is not a good team. There’s a reason Torvik predicts a dominating win over the Tigers. There’s almost nothing that Pacific does well on either end. They are, perhaps, at least an average team at getting offensive boards and don’t give up all that many themselves. They shoot a decent percentage inside the arc–but are awful beyond it on both sides of the ball.

Aside from a clear talent gap, the Tigers have three particularly notable weaknesses: 3P defense, TOs, and fouls. Pacific has one of the worst perimeter defenses in the country, which should be great for Stewart, Bryan, O’Neil, etc. to shoot some wide-open looks, assuming good ball movement. Pacific also turns the ball over on almost 1/5 of their possessions. SCU tried playing some tighter defense than usual against SMC, especially in the first half (did they play a second half? I can’t recall…) That should lead to plenty of steals against this group of Tigers. And lastly, Pacific will send you to the line a lot. So the Broncos need to make their free throws to push the advantage.

Basically, Pacific has the occasional fluke game that keeps them in it. Unfortunately for WSU, they had two fluke games against the Cougars. But this is not a good team whose mean performance should lead to a 20+ point SCU victory. But be on guard for the fluke game…

X-Factors:

  • Lamar Washington got 40 in the overtime win in Pullman. He was quiet in the return game, though Pacific still got the win. But be cautious about the hot hand on this Pacific team and work to shut down any player who is overperforming their averages. UOP will ride the hot hand as long as you let them.
  • Can the Broncos mentally put the SMC loss behind them? For 12 minutes, SCU hadn’t looked so lost since Reno in November. Stewart called his own number and helped make the final score respectable in garbage time. Can SCU find a flow like they had against WSU? It isn’t like Pacific is going to play shut-down defense, so SCU should be able to work the ball around and find the best shots.

Prediction: SCU plays angry, and the offense is back big. 94-71 Santa Clara. O’Neil and Tongue both put up double-doubles.

3 Likes

Watched most of the WSU-Pacific Thursday. That’s the first I’ve watched more than a minute of a Pacific game this season.
Was kind an ugly, grinder game and seemed WSU could never get untracked. UOP plays a slower tempo which is not to WSU’s favor.
The overall talent level is not great as one would guess from their record and futility, but there are a handful of solid players who can give a team trouble, namely forward Elias Ralph, wing Elijah Fisher, and point guard Lamar Washington.

  • 6-7 Canadian forward Ralph is a senior transfer from Univ of Victoria. He does a bit of everything for them, is their leading rebounder, 2nd leading scorer and can score from the post and perimeter.
  • 6-6, 220lb Canadian wing Elijah Fisher is their top scorer, is strong and succeeds with bully ball, often lowering his shoulder and plowing his way to the hoop. And he gets to the FT line a ton, I believe he’s roughly top 20 in the country in FT attempts and makes.
  • 6-4 point guard Lamar Washington is a capable scorer, and is avg. 5.4 assists/game.

7-0 center Jazz Gardner looks athletic and had a good game vs. WSU with 14pts on 7-7 shooting, however his playing time and stats have been extremely inconsistent, playing ~5mins one game, 25+ the next. So hard to know what to expect from him.

Again, there’s just enough talent on the Tigers that the Broncos can not take this game for granted. Need to show up and play w/ decent energy, rebound (UOP outrebounded WSU by 10) and play with good player and ball movement on O. And whoever is matched up on Ralph (Ensminger and O’Neil most likely) and Fisher (like Bryan and Mahi) are going to have to be focused, ready for physical play and defend without fouling excessively.

Sidebar…deferring to Patty on the overall game preview. We’re sharing duties the rest of the season, splitting home/away.

5 Likes

Broncos currently 16.5 point favorites

11 assists on 13 made shots, though UOP’s defense leaves a lot to be desired. Lets keep it going.

3 Likes

Getting lackadaisical, especially on the boards. Tongue and Bal playing with fire. The rest need to match their energy.

2 Likes

Did what we needed to do against a not very good team.

Hopefully a confidence builder and an opportunity to flush the SMC game.

Two more easy games next week against Portland and USD before the SMC rematch the following week.

5 Likes

Terrific answer to SMC loss! Broncos shot 55% from the field, 22 assists, and owned the glass. I really liked our ball movement tonight, and really good defensively. Cam and BK did a great job tonight off the bench, and starters were solid too! We did what we needed to do…Good win!!

10 Likes

While I Understand your sentiments I believe it is clear that there are no easy games for the Broncos. When they think that way they lose. LMU and NDS are examples of that. I think we only beat USD by one in San Diego. I hope you are correct but also know our team cant look past anyone. It was a nice win last night and we still have to play UOP on the road and that won’t be an easy game either.

3 Likes

Of course, my comment was a brief one, on my phone, heading out the door.
With more time I may have said: ‘…SHOULD be two easy games this week against less talented teams IF the Broncos play w/ energy and focus, control the glass, play above avg D and don’t settle for 3’s and bad shots.’
But by this point given the play of this team this season, that should all be implied given the copious discussion, including from me, on the inconsistency of this team and failures against lessor talented teams.

See my post above, #2 post in this thread…more or less making this same point re: this bad Pacific team…there are still players (Ralph and Fisher as examples) who can hurt you and you still have to bring energy and focus and play a decent game. Same will be true for both Portland and USD.

7 Likes

Portland hurt us last year. Hopefully we don’t make the same mistakes this year.

3 Likes

They’re also off a dominating win over Pepperdine in Malibu. I’m not sure anyone saw that coming. So Portland can also get hot and shock you if you don’t put them to bed early.

2 Likes

No problem. I agree with the should be and if we play modifiers. This team is very frustrating to watch. The minute you think we should be ok we put up a stinker. When you think we ar dead they play well (second USF game and Gonzaga). I’d like to think we finish in the top three in league but we can come in anywhere from second to seventh based on our uneven play.

2 Likes

‘What could have been’ has been the theme of the Sendek era for the past 4 seasons.

For one or two seasons you might be able to blame some bad luck, the ball not bouncing your way, maybe an untimely injury. But no excuses when it happens four straight seasons.

5 Likes