25’-25’ WCC Game #17: @ St. Mary’s

Tip-off: Wednesday, 8pm in the University Credit Union Pavillion
TV: CBSSN
Line:
Over/Under:
Kenpom: Broncos #35, Gaels #27

This Wednesday’s showdown between two of the WCC’s top dogs carries major implications for both the conference title race and the NCAA Tournament bubble. The Broncos currently sit in second place in the WCC with an identical 14–2 conference record. Santa Clara holds the tiebreaker over Saint Mary’s thanks to the Broncos’ January victory.

The Gaels will close the regular season at home against Santa Clara and Gonzaga — a significant advantage, given how dominant they’ve been on their home floor. They haven’t lost back-to-back home games since the 2020–21 COVID season. In fact, they’ve won 24 straight at home, with their last loss coming against Utah State in 2024. The last time Santa Clara won in Moraga was during that 2020–21 season; prior to that, the Broncos hadn’t beaten the Gaels on their home court since 2014. Saint Mary’s is a notoriously tough out in a hostile, high-stakes environment. Expect everything you can handle from Randy Bennett and his veteran group.

The Gaels enter this matchup riding a six-game winning streak since their last road loss to Gonzaga. At home, they’ve been dominant, cruising past San Diego (USD), San Francisco (USF), and Pepperdine by margins of 28, 24, and 27 points. On the back half of that stretch, however, they survived three road scares against Washington State, Seattle U, and Pacific.

Against Pacific, they were carried by a monster 32-point, 15-rebound performance from Marciulionis. He and Dent combined for 57 of the team’s 72 points — nearly 79% of the total offensive output. The Gaels were efficient and controlled the glass with 38 rebounds while committing just four turnovers, but received only nine points from the bench.

The Seattle U matchup followed a similar script — a grind-it-out battle between two top-25 defenses. With four minutes left, Saint Mary’s executed down the stretch. Marciulionis, Lewis, and McKeever led the way with 15, 22, and 15 points, respectively, accounting for 72% of the team’s scoring. Seattle’s aggressive defense forced 16 turnovers, but the Gaels still managed to secure 36 rebounds and enough half-court execution to close it out.

Most recently against Washington State, the Cougars pushed the tempo, resulting in a higher-scoring affair. The Gaels prevailed 83–??, with Marciulionis, Lewis, and Dent combining for 55 of the team’s 83 points (66%). All three shot 45% or better from the field, and Saint Mary’s knocked down 10 of 20 from three (50%). The bench also chipped in 16 valuable points.

Seattle disrupted the Gaels’ three-point shooting, holding them to 25%, but Saint Mary’s compensated at the free-throw line, going 21-for-27 (78%). Against Pacific, they shot 86% from the stripe and just 30% from three, yet still pulled away late for an 11-point win.

The numbers paint a consistent picture: Saint Mary’s is smart, poised, and physical on the glass. They are deliberate yet decisive in the half court, patient enough to milk the clock and disciplined enough to execute when they get their shot. Defensively, they force tough looks without gambling for turnovers. They rarely beat themselves and rank among the nation’s best free-throw shooting teams.

IMG_3705.jpeg

IMG_3704.jpeg

On Senior Night, in their building where they’ve been elite, expect a sharper version of the Gaels than what we saw in Santa Clara. Still, they are beatable — and this Broncos team is capable.

For Santa Clara, the formula is clear. The Broncos must pressure the glass and eliminate second-chance opportunities. They need to stay out of foul trouble and run Saint Mary’s off the three-point line. The Gaels funnel most of their offense through their top three scorers, so Herb Sendek’s game plan has to force others to step up. Santa Clara can also look to speed the game up in transition, generating easier baskets before the Gaels’ half-court defense gets set. Attacking the paint and challenging their bigs will be critical. With the Broncos’ depth and physicality — especially with Darlan stepping up — they have the tools to make this a fight.

Wednesday night has all the makings of a classic: discipline versus pace, execution versus pressure, home-court dominance versus revenge motivation. The stakes couldn’t be higher.

4 Likes

Obviously, how much - if at all - Graves can play is a big question mark… He played a lot last time, though it wasn’t one of his crazy output games.

They’re beatable, but its very hard to win at McKeon Pavilion.

I think we have more on the line - the other paths to the dance feel very fraught with uncertainty, though I think there is a way.

Does anyone smarter than me understand the variance between our Torvik ranking (#29, ahead of SMC) vs our NET Ranking 40?

4 Likes

I’m not smarter than you, but it’s different weighting of certain variables in the algorithms. Since NET is a proprietary algorithm, no one except the NCAA would know for sure the answer. But I feel relatively confident that it’s how recency bias is weighted: more on Torvik, less on NET.

Since the Broncos have been really hot in conference play and dominant in the last 10 or so, Torvik’s methodology seems to give more credit to recent play. Whereas the NET (which has always tracked KenPom a little more closely since he helped design it) likely has a more even distribution of the weighting so that Loyola is still weighing SCU down.

But the most important piece: the NCAA claims that they don’t really use NET as a predictive tool like they do Torvik or KenPom. Rather, it’s a resume sorting tool that creates the Quads. So SCU’s NET ranking doesn’t (per the NCAA) really matter for SCU. Rather, SCU’s opponents’ NETs are important to sort the win and loss quality.

4 Likes

WAB has garnered more attention, or so I’ve heard.

1 Like

Yep. Reportedly it’s the single most important metric. Which is pretty good for SCU as it helps paper over Loyola a bit.

Thank you sir!

While at some level my favorite list is whichever has SCU highest at the moment, I really do find the Torvik site to be really informative and interesting - presumably KenPom is as well, if one pays for it. The NET page is, as you mention, much more static and shadowy.

The hour grows late indeed - February 23rd - and the clock has not struck midnight on our chances. And a loss in Moraga doesn’t even end the story, either.

It’s been a very blessed year, even with those annoying blemishes, and I’m enjoying it all. A puncher’s chance in Moraga to punch a ticket to the Big Dance is a really happy thing.

6 Likes

While it won’t generate the hype of Gonzaga in Leavey, this game is now more important than that one was.

Win, and SCU has an inside track to its first NCAA bid in 30 years and all but locks up the 2 seed with a real shot at claiming a share of the WCC Championship.

Lose, and SCU is basically locked into the 3 seed and will need to sweat a good amount during the WCC Tournament, likely needing to win 2 games to feel good on Selection Sunday.

I’ll be in Moraga and will be interested in what energy the home crowd brings. I don’t anticipate that SCU fans will be anywhere near as organized or forceful as on the Hilltop. But I do think that there will be a lot of SCU fans while many Gaels will save their energy for the Zags game on Saturday. Santa Clara was given a huge gift traveling to Moraga during “Gonzaga Week.” With that and an 8 pm tip, I think the UCU Pavilion home court advantage will be muted a bit more than usual.

6 Likes