Looking at the jerseys that SCU has retired, it’s clear that its meant to be a truly serious honor, not something they do every few years. I don’t think any of the players mentioned in the 2000-2020 era above make the cut. The bar is quite high.
It’s worth recalling that the bulk of these were retired one by by over the course of the 100th anniversary season (around 2007).
If there is an over-arching theme to the list - Feerick, Sears, Ogden, Awtrey, Vanos, Nash, Jalen, it’s these three criteria:
-
Did they play in the post-season (NCAA or NIT)? All meet this, except Feerick, who essentially was too early. I believe SCU turned down an NCAA or NIT bid in the late 30s, but can’t recall for sure. And he certainly coached the Broncos in the NCAA tournament.
-
Were they an All-American? Or Conference POY? Feerick, Sears, Ogden, Awtrey were all-Americans. Sears (2x) Awtrey (2x), Rambis and Nash (2x) were CPOY. Feerick pre-dates the WCC, but again coached a CPOY. Jalen does not meet this one.
-
Do they have a significant connection to the NBA? It’s totally arguable whether this should matter since it’s a college honor, but clearly it’s a difference maker.
- Feerick played and coached in the NBA/BAA
- Sears played in the NBA
- Ogden’s career in the NBA was not distinguished, but is counterbalanced by his Bronco team being the best ever
- Awtrey had a long NBA career and won a championship
- Rambis won four rings and coached in the NBA
- Nash was a two time NBA MVP and is an NBA HOF guy.
- Jalen has had an immediate NBA impact and has already won a championship.
A few more thoughts:
Vanos is, perhaps, a special category given his death (even though he also checks the achievement boxes).
Feerick has the unique attribute of having coached Sears and one of the better all time SCU teams, as part of 12 years of leading the Broncos. He also coached the Warriors. He, in a sense, helped put SCU basketball on the map and it could be viewed as a broader lifetime achievement award. I believe his number was retired well after his death.
Feerick, Sears, Ogden, and then Nash all probably met a test of “best player so far”. Jalen was the highest draft pick ever, though his collegiate career was not better than most of the list. His pro career may end up being the best in time.
All of the retired numbers were, at a time (college or pro), were close to nationally famous - i.e., Sports Illustrated cover, All-American, First Round Pick, or prominent NBA face (Rambis, Nash, Jalen).
If there’s one missing, it’s Dick Garibaldi, who played on the 1952 Final Four team and coached the 1969 team that went 27-2.
I love the Brody Angleys, Doron Perkins, John Bryants, Sean Denisons and all the rest, but with (1) no NIT or NCAA trip from 2000-2022 and (2) no NBA draft picks, there just isn’t a guy in there who makes the grade in my opinion. I feel no need to retire a jersey just to fill the gap. 2000-2020 was the worst period of Santa Clara basketball on a team and individual achievement basis since WWII.
If John Bryant had played for a few seasons in the NBA and an NIT, I think he’d be up there. Hard to say whether that’s fair.
Should Jalen’s number be retired? His college career was not exceptional in the way the other men on the list’s were, broadly speaking. He did break a long NIT drought, he’s the highest drafted Bronco ever, and he’s validated that with an NBA championship. There are so few mid-major players drafted anymore.
It’s cuspy and a little bit of a momentum grab, but I think it’s okay. I think there’s an argument that we didn’t build upon the Nash era and compound the interest, so to speak - maybe this well help keep the period of success going…